Pakistan vs india war latest news

On Saturday, President Trump announced that India and Pakistan had reached an agreement on a cease-fire following four days of the most intense conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations in decades.

“After a long night of U.S.-mediated negotiations, I’m pleased to share that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE,” Trump posted on Truth Social, praising both sides for demonstrating “Common Sense and Great Intelligence.”

Indian and Pakistani authorities confirmed the cease-fire through their respective social media channels, although neither directly acknowledged any U.S. involvement in the mediation process.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio later stated that he and Vice President JD Vance had been in direct contact with senior officials from both nations, including the prime ministers, over the past 48 hours. According to Rubio, along with agreeing to halt hostilities, India and Pakistan also consented to begin discussions on a broader range of issues at a neutral venue.

However, India’s Ministry of External Affairs pushed back against Rubio’s remarks, asserting that the cease-fire had been negotiated bilaterally between New Delhi and Islamabad without any commitment to broader talks.

The current escalation began last month after a deadly militant attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir. India accused Pakistan of providing shelter to the groups responsible and pledged to take action. Pakistan has firmly denied any connection to the attackers.

The situation rapidly escalated into a military standoff on Wednesday when India conducted airstrikes inside Pakistani territory. In the following days, both countries engaged in intense combat involving waves of missile strikes and drone attacks. By Saturday morning, both nations were targeting each other’s air bases.

Key Developments:

Diplomatic Push: Multiple countries with strong ties to both India and Pakistan—including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE—had been working to ease tensions. The U.S., European Union, and China all urged restraint as concerns of a full-scale war mounted.

Drone Warfare: This was the first significant use of attack drones by both countries against one another. Both sides deployed primarily one-way “kamikaze” drones, similar to those widely used in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Clashes in Kashmir: Some of the fiercest fighting occurred along the Line of Control in the disputed Kashmir region. Dozens of civilians have been killed as cross-border shelling intensified.

Domestic Reactions:

The conflict unfolded amid rising hypernationalism in India. Those who voiced support for de-escalation on social media were subjected to trolling, doxxing, and accusations of lacking patriotism. One journalist, whose phone number was leaked after posting calls for peace, sarcastically wrote on X, “Now please go find Donald Trump’s phone number.” Another user questioned, “De-escalation is cool now?”

During his decade-long tenure, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently maintained a tough stance on Pakistan, aiming to isolate and pressure its leadership. Many of his supporters viewed the recent military actions as a validation of his strongman image. “We voted for strength, and he delivered,” said Manoj Misra, a resident of Lucknow.

However, some voices in India began to question whether the military action had achieved its intended goal of deterring future terrorist threats. Former Indian Army Chief Ved Prakash Malik reflected on X: “We’ve left it to history to judge what, if any, strategic gains have been made.”

In a move signaling a de-escalation of hostilities, Pakistan reopened its airspace to all flights on Saturday afternoon, according to the country’s aviation authority. The airspace had been shut down in the early hours of the day as military tensions with India reached a peak.

The closure had significant ripple effects on global air travel, as airlines were forced to reroute flights to avoid the region. Prior to the conflict, nearly 700 flights traversed Pakistani airspace daily. That number plummeted to just 18 on Wednesday following India’s airstrikes, as reported by Flightradar24.

With the reopening of the skies, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) announced the full resumption of flight operations across its network. The national carrier confirmed that all aircraft and ground equipment, which had been moved to secure locations as a safety precaution, were now back in their designated operational zones.

India and Pakistan, old enemies, had a new weapon this time: drones.(Pakistan vs india war latest news)

The latest escalation between India and Pakistan introduced a concerning shift in modern warfare, as both sides deployed attack drones—a method military experts say marks a new and troubling development. This reflects the growing use of drones in global conflicts.

In recent years, both India and Pakistan have invested in developing their domestic drone industries while also relying on imports from allied nations. During the recent clashes triggered by a militant attack in the disputed Kashmir region, most of the drones used were identified as one-way kamikaze drones. These unmanned systems, known for their use in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, are quickly becoming a standard feature in 21st-century combat.

James Patton Rogers, a drone warfare specialist at Cornell University, explained that drones are often employed as the least escalatory option in a conflict. They’re typically used to probe enemy air defenses and apply tactical pressure without immediate large-scale consequences.

According to Rogers, over 118 countries now possess drone capabilities—nearly double the number from 2010. He noted that while Pakistan likely maintains a smaller drone fleet, it has developed several offensive models, including loitering munitions, and imports armed drones from nations like China and Turkey.

India’s drone program, by contrast, is more advanced. It includes a range of drones designed for land, air, and naval operations, with additional imports from partners such as Israel, Rogers added.

Shuja Nawaz, former director at The Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center, observed that both nations appeared to be using drones not only for strikes but also for surveillance—tracking enemy weapon positions and testing reaction times. He also pointed out that neither side seemed willing to acknowledge international norms regulating sovereign airspace.

Trump Mass Layoffs Blocked by Judge Amid Program Closure Plans